|
| Concurrence | width=25px | | Other |- | width=25px | | Dissent | width=25px | | Concurrence/dissent | white-space: nowrap |Total = | 18 |- | colspan=2 | Bench opinions = 18 | colspan=2 | Opinions relating to orders = 0 | colspan=2 | In-chambers opinions = 0 |- | white-space: nowrap colspan=2 valign=top | Unanimous decisions: 2 | colspan=2 valign=top | Most joined by: Ginsburg (14) | colspan=2 valign=top | Least joined by: Scalia, Thomas (5) |} |} |} | valign=top | | width=20% valign=top |Unanimous |- | bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top | |- | align=right valign=top | | valign=top | | width=20% valign=top |Rehnquist, Stevens, O'Connor, Ginsburg, Breyer |- | bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top |Scalia and Thomas filed dissents. |- | align=right valign=top | | valign=top | | width=20% valign=top |Rehnquist, O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas |- | bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top |Ginsburg and Breyer filed dissents. |- | align=right valign=top | | valign=top | | width=20% valign=top |Rehnquist, O'Connor, Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer |- | bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top |Stevens filed a dissent. |- | align=right valign=top | | valign=top | | width=20% valign=top |Scalia |- | bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top | |- | align=right valign=top | | valign=top | | width=20% valign=top | |- | bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top |Souter was the sole dissenter from Scalia's opinion. |- | align=right valign=top | | valign=top | | width=20% valign=top |Ginsburg |- | bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top |Souter filed one of three dissents. |- | align=right valign=top | | valign=top |Bankruptcy; state sovereign immunity | width=20% valign=top |Ginsburg |- | bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top | |- | align=right valign=top | | valign=top |Americans with Disabilities Act; state sovereign immunity | width=20% valign=top |Ginsburg |- | bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top | |- | align=right valign=top | | valign=top | | width=20% valign=top |Rehnquist, Stevens, O'Connor, Ginsburg, Breyer; Scalia, Kennedy (in part) |- | bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top | |- | align=right valign=top | | valign=top | | width=20% valign=top |Unanimous |- | bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top | |- | align=right valign=top | | valign=top | | width=20% valign=top |Kennedy |- | bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top | |- | align=right valign=top | | valign=top |Criminal procedure | width=20% valign=top |Rehnquist, Stevens, O'Connor, Kennedy, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer |- | bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top |Souter's opinion for the Court held that a defendant attempting to reverse his conviction due to a Fed. R. Crim. P. 11 violation must show a reasonable probability that, but for the trial court's error in failing to advise him his guilty plea could not be withdrawn, he would not have entered the plea. Justice Antonin Scalia concurred in the judgment but disagreed with Souter's standard. |- | align=right valign=top | | valign=top | | width=20% valign=top |Ginsburg |- | bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top |Souter filed one of two dissents from Thomas' 5-4 decision. |- | align=right valign=top | | valign=top |Due process; habeas corpus | width=20% valign=top |Ginsburg |- | bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top | |- | align=right valign=top | | valign=top | | width=20% valign=top |Stevens, Ginsburg, Breyer |- | bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top | |- | align=right valign=top | | valign=top | | width=20% valign=top |Stevens, Ginsburg |- | bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top | |- | align=right valign=top | | valign=top | | width=20% valign=top |Stevens, O'Connor, Kennedy; Rehnquist, Scalia, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer (in part) |- | bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top | |} ==References== * * * 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「2003 term United States Supreme Court opinions of David Souter」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク
|